Category Archives: Entertainment

Rebooting ghosts, werewolves, vampires and gladiators

The concept of the film or TV reboot is now well accepted. In the next few months cinema goers will be treated to reboots of the Spiderman and Batman (Dark Knight) franchises. This year already TV fantasy fans have enjoyed a reboot of BBC3’s Being Human and Spartacus.

Producers play the film and TV reboots card usually to extend the life of a successful franchise when its existing actors either become too old for their roles or express their desire to move on to avoid being typecast.

The earliest example of a TV reboot is probably Doctor Who. When original actor William Hartnell left, the producers came up with the idea of allowing the character to “regenerate” into a completely different body. It was still the same person, an eccentric time traveller fighting evil across the universe, but each regeneration brought a different personality and interpretation. In this instance the reboot became integral to the story. Eventually by 1989 even this innovative method of keeping the programme fresh couldn’t save a tired format from plummeting audiences. The series was then rested for 16 years before being fully reinvented, re-suited and rebooted for a whole new generation. Doctor Who is now one of the most successful TV shows in the world.

In cinemas James Bond has been similarly refreshed by replacing the lead actor. Despite a few hiccups this has kept the franchise alive and we are now approaching the 50th anniversary of the first film, Doctor No.

film and tv reboots

Being Human is one of my favourite black comedy dramas and one of BBC3’s best products. The idea of a ghost, vampire and werewolf living together as house mates makes for extremely funny situations, some deep heart searching drama, and of course some frightening darkness interspersed with quite violent scenes.

Faced with the departure of two of the main male leads, the producers could have rested the series. But instead, over the course of the six episodes of season 4 they reinvented the show until we were left with three completely different actors playing a ghost, a vampire and a werewolf (but not the same ones!). Was this successful? I certainly didn’t enjoy this series as much as the first three, but I would agree that the producers have “pulled it off”.

film and tv reboots

Spartacus, a blood soaked, almost soft porn laden Roman sandal opera had to be rebooted because sadly the lead actor died of cancer?  And the chief villain played by the wonderfully vile John Hannah was killed at the end of the first series. Again I’m not convinced that the new actor was anywhere near as good as Andy Whitfield but the supporting characters remained interesting enough to carry the show into ever bloodier battles, and examples of Roman sexual excesses.

As useful as the reboot is to the franchise producer I do wonder whether it stifles creativity and prevents new ideas from finding screen time. Would it be better to find completely new concepts and stories rather than continually reinvent the old ones?

Over to you: Do you agree with film and TV reboots or would you rather a film or TV franchise came to a natural end to be replaced with something completely new? Please post you thoughts in the comments box below.

Why the Backlash against the Detective and the Time Traveller?

Given that both Doctor Who and the first episode of the second series of Sherlock gathered nearly 10 million viewers each, you would think that they must have been pretty popular. But whilst there have been positive reviews of both in the traditional media, online it is different.

Tweeters are angry at how the Christmas day episode of Who presented an unsubtle environmental message and resolved the storyline with a “men are weak, women are strong” device. They also felt that there was a forced happy ending by wimping out on the implied death of Reg Arwell, the father of the children in the story.

Bloggers are fuming with anger over the way the same writer, (Stephen Moffat for he wrote both) recreated Conan Doyle’s original Victorian opera singer, Irene Adler, as a modern day dominatrix prostitute. Even the mainstream media were furious over her nude scenes shown before the watershed. In fairness her hands and the camera angles hid anything “rude”.

Is Moffat being too stereotypical in his portrayal of the women in his stories? Or are we reading to much into it and what we actually did was to create two great stories which actually entertained huge audiences?

Think about the Christmas day episode. By the time it came on air at 7pm, most people will have eaten a huge Christmas feast, drunk wine and champagne, guzzled Quality Street chocolates and eaten them even more Twiglets. Some may even have had a second plate of turkey for supper. Brains were fuzzy. Eyes were heavy. What we did not need at this point was the usual complexity of a Moffat plot weaving different time streams and interlinked stories of incredible intricacy. We wanted a light, family oriented story that would fit with our Christmas evening stupor. It’s what we got.

Doctor Who and SherlockIn 1941 Madge Arwell receives a telegram. Her husband is missing in a presumed crashed Lancaster bomber. She takes her children to a remote country house where they are entertained by a mysterious “Care-taker”. They get transported to a “Narnia” inspIred snow filled forest where they help the trees to escape from an imminent environmental catastrophe. Only Madge is strong enough to operate the spacecraft that is their salvation. And as she flies the children home the ship becomes a beacon that her husband Reg can use to make a safe landing.

For those who accuse Moffat of wimping out on the father dying, they miss the point. The episode raises the possibility of the death of loved ones and that’s something that any child has to face eventually. But it doesn’t go all the way and for a Christmas day family episode that is exactly right. Reg Arwell was “missing” but he wasn’t dead. As it turned out he followed the space craft -time jumped over a few days and arrived at the country house. For him, he was never missing at all.

Doctor Who and SherlockSherlock’s episode was a modern re-imaging of “Scandal in Bohemia” and unlike Christmas Who, was multi-layered, complex and therefore satisfying. I suppose I can understand the critics of the modern Irene Adler being a sex worker, and that it might have been done purely for titilation. Is this indicative of our society that modern writers have to reinvent heroines of old to conform to the plastic sexuality of the Reality TV world? Actually, I don’t think Moffat had these debates with himself. I think he just wrote two great stories both of which demanded very strong female lead characters and it was the stories that decided their circumstances .

Taken separately they might appear stereotypical, but separately they were just two examples of different women. Madge was a loving mother protecting her children at Christmas, Irene was an ambitious woman using her sexuality to make herself safe in a dangerous political world.

Doctor Who and Sherlock

Doctor Who and Sherlock carried by two strong women.”

So two strong stories carried by two strong women. As for the males  I thought the leads, Matt Smith and Benedict Cumberbatch were both at the top of their game. Pages could be written on the relationship between Holmes and Watson, and even the most ardant critics must have shed a secret tear when the Doctor was reunited with Amy Pond for Christmas dinner.

Stephen Moffat served up two exquisite slices of Christmas pudding. Okay so Doctor Who might have been a little too syrupy, but I was one of those with a wine softened brain who needed something light, happy, family oriented and above all “nice” to enjoy on Christmas night. It worked for me.

Happy New Year – Welcome to my revamped Blog Site

Welcome to my revamped blog.

Edinburgh Winter Wonderland - 1st picture in revamped blogIn the last month we’ve been wind beaten and chilled to the bone. But the festive season has been lovely. A great time recharge the batteries and relax with family. Edinburgh sparkles in the crisp winter weather.

“Revamped blog.”

Now it’s time to get back in the gym. More fitness classes. More Yoga. And more blogging.

Happy New Year everyone. Have a great 2012.

Updating a Cheating Memory – Day of the Daleks review

day of the daleks review

Okay so I’ve always been a Doctor Who fan. I love the modern reboot and especially the “timey whimey” stories that show runner Steven Moffat is so well known for. You know – he’s always getting things that happen in the future mixing with things that happen in the present. Or do I mean the past? The grandfather principle and all that brain aching stuff. Some people say it is too complicated. I disagree.

One of the earliest stories I ever saw – when I was just a little boy – was the Jon Pertwee story, Day of the Daleks. This had a very time travel paradox orientated story which at the time went over my head. I was more interested in the Daleks and the amazing battle they had with UNIT troops at the end of the story.

For me as a child I was captivated. My memories of that battle, with hundred of Daleks sweeping across the lawn of an Edwardian country house, exterminating the soldiers with their cool “negative” laser blasts, whilst the troops desperately fired mortar grenades at them, super-charged my imagination for many years to come……until I bought the VHS video when it was released 15 years later.

I watched in disbelief. What happened to the battle I remembered? The actual reality was just three battered old Dalek props struggling to glide across the grass whilst a couple of soldiers fired cap guns at them.

Of course when it comes to TV and films that you watch as a child, the memory cheats. My young mind had embellished what it saw with the more descriptive prose of the later novelisation and created a false memory of a spectacle that was way beyond the production and budget capabilities of the 1970s BBC.

However it’s not just me. It seems that the memory cheated for many more people who remember the story with fondness. So hats off to the producers at 2:Entertain for the recently released DVD of the tale. The team have gone back to the original filming locations (such as Dropmore Park in Buckinghamshire) and re-shot some scenes using a 1970s film camera, retro Dalek props and new people dressed as soldiers. On top of this they have added better explosions, more lasers and had the modern Dalek voice artist, Nick Briggs, redub the sound track to make them sound super scary.

The remarkable result cures the cheating memory. They have produced a special edition that is true to the exaggerated memories I formed as a child. Pertwee is still a fabulous Doctor. Here he is authoritative, charming and resourceful and shows a particular fondness for red wine whilst fighting his enemies. And he has the best line in the script with his put down of a pompous Government Minister, “Look try and use your intelligence man, even if you are a politician.”

Day of the Daleks was always a great story and script let down by poor production. Now that the old flakiness has been polished we can enjoy this top rate tale as the memory intended. And what a story. Guerrillas from the future traveling back in time to the present to kill the person they think created their Dalek subjugated future (sounds a bit like The Terminator doesn’t it? Except DOTD came first!). It’s a time travel paradox that I never understood as a child.

Now I can understand it, and can watch the show as the tour-de-force my memory always told me it was.